One of the communities that were brought up in the meeting was a church in Seattle called Quest. From what I read, they are a church that serves their community through a coffee house.
Could we do that in the UMC?
It seems like all the extension ministries deal with campsites. But I feel those extension ministries really only benefit churches and the already church-goers. (Maybe I am wrong)
I was thinking, how cool would it be if an annual conference or district decided to experiment and build/buy a coffee shop as an extension ministry, extending ministry to the non-churched or nominally religious.
I don’t think it would be necessary to have the coffee shop overtly Christian. So it couldn’t be named like UMC Coffee House or UMC (C for Coffee). But something like Common Grounds or One Cup or something else cheezy like that.
It would provide a place for people to just hang out. And each night of the week (minus Sunday) would offer ministry opportunities and/or fellowship opportunities.
Like Mondays could be a meeting place for an Anon. group.
Tuesdays could be bible studies and/or small group fellowship for singles, (maybe males on Tuesday and females on Wednesday) and how sometimes it’s just hard to be single and how lonesome it can get when everyone else around you is pairing up.
Thursdays, I don’t know… could be a night where people gather and talk about religion and politics and how one influences the other, and how one SHOULD influence the other.
And Fridays could be live music (and it doesn’t have to be Chrisitan music) and Saturdays would be the worship service.
Of course, the place would have to be big enough (or two stories) where people who don’t want to be a part of any of these things can still come and enjoy coffee. (And doubly of course, the coffee would have to be real good).
I’d go and spend a lot of time there. I’d probably also meet up with parishioners and youth members at this place.
This thought came to me as I was reading Alan Hirsch’s Forgotten Ways. In it he writes, quoting Edward de Bono, “patients generally prefer the doctor to use the known cure rather than seek to design a better on. Yet there may be much better cures to be found. He rightly asks how we are ever to find a better cure if at each critical moment we always opt for the traditional treatment.” (emphasis mine). His church actually experimented with purchasing a coffee shop, which is where the idea originated.
Or maybe, instead of pursuing ordination, I should muster, borrow, steal (joking.. kinda) money to open up a coffee shop of my own and pursue ministry in this way. The good thing about that is no more complaints from parishioners. But what’s worse? A customer’s complaint or a parishioner’s complaint?
What do you think?
If we were to pursue this idea, what would this ministry look like to you?
April 14, 2009 at 1:53 am
what I find most frustrating about this is that what Eugene Cho wrote here: http://eugenecho.wordpress.com/quest/
“At Quest, we’re more concerned about the process rather than the product. The most humbling lesson for me in my recent years was asking God to change the way I define success and how others defined me or our church. We want to be a church not of programs, but of people who are compelled by God to use their gifts and ideas to interpret and convey the grace of Christ.”
is exactly what I wrote here: http://nextgenerationministry.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/rethinking-church-leadership-part-2branding/
“Well, if the church were to be defined as the vessel through which the liberating spirit of Jesus Christ is embodied and effectuated, it ought to first be such a thing. One of the ways the church can do that is by making its process the product. In other words, make everything it does the opposite of the world.”